Play for Her
Givenchy (2010)

Used to own. I usually like sweet perfumes, but this one is not only sweet, it's just a bad pot-pourri... With a weird ending, as I can recall. I gave it away.

A bergamot-peach opening merges into a nonspecific white floral drydown that does not develop very impressively on my skin. The base is a woodsy tone mixed with a generic white musk impression.
Sillage is moderate, projection adequate and I get five hours of longevity. 2.5/5

sorry i don't get any of the ingredients mentioned in basenotes description(magnolia? tiare?reaaaally?).all i get from this perfume is chocalate(that;s why i bought it)smells very sweet and chocolate soufle or milk chocolate i quess.
you will find it strange but a few hours after initial application there is also a strange smell outhere.like a veal steak or something. i'm not kidding , people will think that you have been in a restaurant and your clothes captured the smell of it... unusuall scent so not a total waste of money!

I'm sorry, but this is a: 'why, oh why, oh why' fragrance.What's the point? Seriously! WHY are all the perfume houses repeatedly churning out this generic, sugary, infantile crap? It's not completely hideous, but it sure as hell isn't great, or even good. It's just like 1001 other perfumes flooding the market at the moment and I'm sooooo bored with it now.It seems to me that the perfume industry is hell bent on drowning itself in a vat of syrup - someone throw it a life belt, for God's sake.